bigbounce

Predictions → Quintom w-Crossing

Theoretical (no in-house MCMC yet)

Current constraint

P1A's model-discrimination table records no in-house free-w0–wa analysis. P1B is namaster-proof research software, not an MCMC paper. Quintom discussion is theoretical context only; external DESI analyses do not establish a BigBounce result.

Key results

  • Quintom bounce achieves bounce↔dark-energy unification that ECH cannot
  • Discrimination table positions quintom vs matter bounce vs cuscuton vs ekpyrotic vs inflation
  • External DESI DR2 (Adame et al.) shows 2.8–4.2σ w-crossing — independent of our program
  • An earlier in-house claim of P(quintom-B) = 98.6% (50.9K samples) was traced to a bookkeeping error in an automated run and retracted — there are zero free-w0–wa samples in any of our chains

Connected work

Papers: Paper 1A — quintom framework + model-discrimination table

Timeline

DESI DR2 (external groups) shows 2.8–4.2σ for w-crossing. Our independent MCMC has not yet been run.

Next steps

  • openStand up an actual quintom MCMC: add free w0, wa to the model and run on DESI DR2 BAO + Pantheon+ + DES SN5YR
  • openAdd DES Y6 weak lensing once chains exist
  • openCompute quintom bounce fNL (fill literature gap)
  • openDecide whether quintom belongs as its own paper or as a Paper 1A discrimination-table expansion