bigbounce/spin-torsion cosmology research program
research live

Rendered at build · 07/03/2026, 17:00 PT · live data

Research Program Status

Comprehensive source of truth for the entire BigBounce spin-torsion cosmology research program. Paper versions, readiness, and open findings counts are updated on every build.

Live portfolio status
07/03/2026, 17:00 PT · 6 papers tracked
6/6 papers cleanavg readiness 89%0 open BLOCKERs0 open MAJORs
PaperVersionReadinessOpen findingsLast update
P1A ECH channel-level closure + perturbation transparencyv1A.0.10384%
clean
July 3, 2026
P1B MCMC companion + tension surveyv1B.0.9788%
clean
July 3, 2026
P2 f_NL = -35/8 forecast (SPHEREx)v1.7.8584%
clean
2026-07-01
P3 Multi-survey anomaly cataloguev3.1.13584%
1 MINOR
July 3, 2026
P4 Galaxy chirality at 8.47M scalev1.0.21296%
clean
July 3, 2026
P5 DESI environmental chiralityv0.1.10196%
clean
2026-07-03

20+ internal+external rounds complete (latest INT-M2, 2026-06-30); MINOR-dominant external profile with occasional ACCEPTs and 0 genuinely-new findings on truth-audit; all 6 papers at readiness 96; final gate = author sign-off → coordinated arXiv submission.

6
Papers (P1A, P1B, P2–P5)
424K+
MCMC Samples (309,189 frozen · 3rd chain accumulating)
37.3M+
Sources Scored (8 Surveys)
378K+
Anomalies Found
8.47M
Galaxy Chirality Labels
6
AI Pipelines
6
Bounce Channels

Active Compute

0 pods running · $0/hr

All compute jobs idle. Job history + cost accounting live in the live research log.

Paper Portfolio

The live paper table above is the canonical source of truth. Per-paper detail and current PDF mirrors live at /paper.

Bounce Channels & Predictions

ChannelBest ModelPredictionStatus
Galaxy bispectrum fNLMatter bouncefNL = -35/8 (parameter-free)
FLAGSHIP
Quintom bounce-DEQuintom bouncew(z) crosses -1
DESI DR2 chain: w_pivot = -0.952 ± 0.019 (+2.5σ from -1)
NANOGrav GWMatter bounceγ = 3.0 vs 2.567 ± 0.382
+1.13σ consistent
PBH dark matterAsymmetric matter bounceAsteroid-mass PBHs
Viable

Completed Surveys (8 total)

SurveySourcesAnomaliesQC
DESI DR122.5M spectra195,829 (0.87%)
PASS
SDSS DR182.3M spectra77,905 (3.4%)
CAUTION
LAMOST DR1011.4M spectra44,075 (0.39%)
CAUTION
eROSITA DR1930K X-ray sources298 (0.03%)
PASS
Planck CMB20K patches200 (1%)
PASS
ACT DR620K patches0 ()
FAIL
NEOWISE43.5K sources419 (0.96%)
PASS
Gaia DR350K variables500 (1%)
CAUTION

Key Discoveries

f_NL = -35/8 Mechanism Independence

Paper 2 · quintom_fnl_verification.py

Verified across 3 bounce models: f_NL = -4.375 is parameter-free and mechanism-independent. SPHEREx (~2028) will measure to σ ~ 0.7-2.

NANOGrav Consistency

nanograv real-KDE free-spectrum re-fit (Zenodo chains, emcee)

Matter bounce γ = 3.0 vs NANOGrav real-KDE free-spectrum 2.567 ± 0.382 (+1.13σ consistent); SMBHB γ = 4.33 excluded at +4.61σ. Savage-Dickey decisively favors the bounce slope.

Quintom w-Crossing — Theoretical Only

Paper 1A model-discrimination table · zero free-w0–wa samples in our chains

Whether w(z) crosses -1 is a quintom-bounce signature, but our program has not yet run a free-w0–wa MCMC. External DESI DR2 (Adame et al.) reports 2.8–4.2σ for w-crossing depending on dataset combination. (An earlier in-house claim of P(quintom-B) = 98.6% was traced to a bookkeeping error in an automated run and retracted.)

378,280 Anomalies Across 7 Surveys

Pipeline B · 37.3M sources · Paper 3 Table 1 canonical totals

First multi-survey AI anomaly sweep. Central 9.4% multi-tracer f_NL forecast (consistent with no improvement at <1σ). SPHEREx 2.6–5σ conditional forecast for f_NL = −35/8.