bigbounce

Not yet formal work. Nothing on this page is a claim, a measurement, or a result — see /research and /papers for those. This is the program's open idea backlog.

Cosmology & dark energy

What is dark energy?

The quintom branch of bounce cosmology is a theoretical possibility that predicts w-crossing. External DESI analyses are not a BigBounce result, and our program has not run a free-w0-wa analysis. P1B is namaster-proof research software, not an MCMC paper. The actionable next step would be a separately scoped in-house analysis.

actionable · w0-wa MCMC · DESI DR2 · quintom

f_NL = -35/16: a conditional future test

P2 derives a conditional matter-contraction prediction f_NL = -2.1875. SPHEREx may provide a future test, but no present measurement proves a bounce or resolves the model landscape by itself.

actionable (forecast) · SPHEREx ~2028 · scoped assumptions

What is dark matter?

Some bounce scenarios motivate asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark-matter candidates. This remains a theoretical research direction, not a conclusion from the program's surveys or current artifacts.

future · LISA ~2035 · PBH dark matter

Black holes & extreme gravity

GW echoes from black hole mergers

If black hole interiors contain baby universes, mergers might produce gravitational wave echoes. LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA could detect these in existing data.

actionable · LIGO O4 data · Cai & Zhu 2026

Supermassive black hole formation

Early massive black holes motivate several formation hypotheses, including speculative primordial seeds. The legacy anomaly archive is not a discovery catalog and should not be treated as evidence for any such mechanism.

actionable · JWST data · cross-match with anomaly catalog

Astrophysics & discovery

Exploratory anomaly candidates

Historic exploratory autoencoder runs flagged archival candidates for possible follow-up. They are not confirmed detections and are now legacy/superseded pipeline records. P3 is the integrated Supporting Data Release recovering 181 DESI DR1 TARGETIDs from a frozen historical list, not a standalone discovery claim.

speculative · autoencoder pipeline candidates

Galaxy morphology: what shapes don't fit?

An autoencoder on galaxy images could find unusual morphologies: double nuclei, tidal tails, ring galaxies, or entirely novel structures.

actionable · Legacy Survey cutouts · image autoencoder

Time-domain: what changed?

A future cross-match could identify candidates that are unusual in more than one modality. Such candidates would still require independent validation and would not by themselves support a bounce claim.

actionable · NEOWISE/unTimely · ZTF · $200-400

Search for extraterrestrial intelligence

Dyson spheres at scale

A Dyson sphere would create anomalous IR excess. Prior searches found 7 candidates from 5M stars. We could search 100x more with our pipeline.

actionable · Gaia DR3 + AllWISE · IR excess detection

FRB anomaly detection

Fast radio bursts from cosmological distances — our anomaly detection approach on FRB properties could identify subpopulations that current classification misses.

future · CHIME/FRB catalog · time-series autoencoder

Particle physics

LHC anomaly detection

An unsupervised autoencoder on collision events could find signatures that don't match any Standard Model prediction — new particles hiding in plain sight.

future · LHC Run 3 · CMS/ATLAS open data

Spacetime fabric: discrete or continuous?

LQG predicts discrete spacetime producing energy-dependent photon speeds. Our birefringence prediction is another test of spacetime microstructure.

testable · Fermi-LAT · CTA ~2027

Frontier & cross-domain

Multi-messenger astronomy

Combining heterogeneous data could prioritize future follow-up candidates. Agreement across pipelines is not a discovery confirmation or evidence for a bounce without independent validation.

actionable · cross-survey architecture exists

The Hubify lab scaling vision

Build reproducible discovery infrastructure around explicit parent-catalog, model, score, and selection lineage. Any future outputs should be scoped as question-first programs rather than a paper-count target.

actionable · this is the plan