bigbounce/spin-torsion cosmology research program
research live

Research programs · evidence library

Research programs

Three research questions lead this portfolio. The PDFs, software, data products, and candidate manuscripts below retain their versioned evidence without being presented as six equal scientific claims.

Primary theory result with a boundary Note and reusable research software.

Bounce theory

Question: Does matter-dominated contraction produce a distinctive, reproducible primordial non-Gaussian amplitude?

Boundary: Nonlinear transmission through a specified bounce completion and survey-native covariance remain open scientific conditions.

Lead Theory Paper · Matter-Contraction Non-Gaussianity · 2 · v1.7.130
The Exact Matter-Contraction Non-Gaussian Amplitude: Four-Vertex Derivation and Conditional Large-Scale-Structure Mapping

The bounce program's core prediction: an exact primordial non-Gaussianity amplitude (f_NL = −35/16)

Derives fNL = −35/16 for the stated matter-contraction background and cubic action, then maps that result conditionally to published and in-house large-scale-structure sensitivity estimates. v1.7.130 adds the APS AI-use disclosure and a drift-proof deposit reference; its final-hash bounded confirmation and Houston review remain separate from the earlier evidence.

12 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage
Focused Theory Note · ECH Boundary Result · 1 · v1A.0.127
Algebraic Cartan Elimination in Minimal Einstein–Cartan–Holst Gravity: Spin-Sourced Contact and Zero-Spin Scalar Branches

What minimal spin-torsion gravity can and cannot change — a boundary-setting theory note

A compact CQG Note deriving the minimal Einstein–Cartan–Holst axial contact interaction and the zero-spin canonical-scalar branch. v1A.0.127 adds the mandatory declarations and availability section; earlier exact-PDF findings were truth-audited to zero genuinely-new-real. Final-hash bounded confirmation and Houston's own review remain distinct open gates.

8 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage
Research Software · Exact-Window Verification · 1B · v2B.0.16
namaster-proof: Exact pseudo-Cℓ Window Inference and Tamper-Evident Provenance for Reproducible Spin-2 Analyses

Software that proves a common CMB/LSS analysis shortcut wasn't taken — verification + tamper-evident receipts

P1B is a focused software metapaper around namaster-proof 0.1.7. Its evidence shows the workspace is deterministically regenerable; v2B.0.16 makes the manuscript-versus-software version boundary legible. The archival DOIs are published, while final-hash confirmation, correspondence metadata, and human review remain separate gates.

6 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage

Supporting validation dossier · P1A/P1B companion

Reproducible Cosmological Proxy and Pipeline Checks: Stock-CAMB ΛCDM+ΔN_eff MCMC, Synthetic NaMaster Recovery, and a Generic Spectator-ALP Birefringence Fit

The MCMC validation dossier behind the bounce-theory papers — chains, configs, and controls

Three self-contained reproducibility checks, none of which tests or measures torsion: a stock-CAMB/Cobaya ΛCDM+ΔN_eff MCMC proxy (309,189 frozen samples, ΔN_eff consistent with zero), a 500-realization synthetic NaMaster E→B pseudo-Cℓ pipeline-recovery validation, and a generic spectator-ALP birefringence consistency fit with a quantified prior-predictive accommodation cost. Frozen chains, configs, and scripts are publicly archived.

Read PDF →

In preparation · structural no-go survey (14-barrier catalog)

A Structural No-Go Survey of Minimal Spin-Torsion Routes to Dark Energy and Bounce Phenomenology

Which minimal spin-torsion routes to dark energy or a bounce are structurally closed — a 14-barrier survey (draft)

A systematic survey of 7 foundation mechanism classes and 6 observational branches, extracted from the retired P1U barrier catalog, giving 14 distinct mechanism-class constraints across 14 catalog entries and closing four candidate dark-energy routes (R1-R4). Draft v1C.0.15, compiled 25 pp, 0 undefined refs, 0 overfull boxes — closes the R12 correctness-convergence board on the exact v1C.0.14 PDF (sha256 9dd5c708..., 24 pp). Four legs: Claude Opus INT MAJOR REVISIONS (2 MAJOR / 9 MINOR, five candidate findings withdrawn after 300-DPI re-render or artifact cross-check), Grok grok-4.3 REJECT (3 ESSENTIAL / 3 MAJOR / 2 NIT, all scope, self-containment, and length, none computational), and Gemini gemini-3.1-pro-preview ACCEPT WITH MINOR CORRECTIONS (1 MINOR + 2 NIT) — Gemini's second ACCEPT-class verdict on P1C after its R4 ACCEPT, and the board's third ACCEPT-class verdict overall (Gemini R4, Claude R5, Gemini R12); the Perplexity leg FAILED and is recorded as failed, never a verdict. The headline of the round: both of Claude's MAJORs were CONFIRMED CORRECT by an independent computation that solved the Einstein-Cartan-Holst connection equation directly (research/theory_audit/ech_torsion_onshell_2026_08_08.py and .md) — varying the first-order ECH action with respect to all 24 independent contorsion components with no irrep ansatz, cross-checked against an independent differential-form route, gives on-shell torsion T_abc = alpha*eps_abcd*J5^d + beta*(eta_ab*J5_c - eta_ac*J5_b) with beta/alpha = 1/(2*gamma); both the axial and the trace-vector irreps are nonzero at every finite nonzero gamma, and the tensor irrep is identically zero. Pure axiality is only the gamma -> infinity Einstein-Cartan limit; at the LQG value gamma = 0.2375 the trace-vector coefficient is 2.11x the axial one. The referee was right, and the correction overturns a result one of this repository's own prior released artifacts had asserted as pure-axial torsion; that artifact now carries a dated erratum addendum stating the corrected result while leaving its original text and provenance intact. Consequences landed in v1C.0.15: O4 is NOT identically zero on shell - O4(bare) = -24*alpha*beta*(J5.J5) = -192*pi^2*G^2*gamma^3/(1+gamma^2)^2*(J5.J5), i.e. O4^[4] = -3*kappa*gamma^3/(1+gamma^2)^2*(J5.J5), so the paper's 'strictly stronger disposal' claim is WITHDRAWN; O1 = O6 = -O2 + (1/2)O4 on shell, so O1 and O6 are NOT exact total derivatives on the ECH branch; O1 = O6 and the Nieh-Yan relation 2*O1 + 2*O2 - O4 = 0 both SURVIVE, re-verified at finite gamma on six curved on-shell ECH configurations at gamma in {19/80, 1, 3}, while O1 = -O2 FAILS. The physics conclusion survives intact: O1, O4 and O6 join O5 in the kappa-suppressed Fierz-closed (J5.J5) disposal class, with O4^[4]/O5^[4] = gamma/(1+gamma^2) ~ 0.22 at gamma = 0.2375 — no new light scale, and the 'no (meV)^4 vacuum energy without a new light scale' conclusion is unchanged. A genuine manuscript convention inconsistency was also fixed: Sec. II's T = kappa*S and App. E's Eq. (E2) normalizations differed by a factor of two in torsion amplitude; the survey now uses Eq. (E2)'s normalization (the Freidel-Minic-Takeuchi solution of the connection equation) throughout, stated as such in both Sec. II and App. E, and O5 reduces to -3*kappa*[gamma^2/(1+gamma^2)]*(J5.J5). Appendix C's claim that the trace-vector and tensor torsion irreps 'appear only when the minimal coupling assumption is relaxed' was FALSE for the trace-vector and is corrected: only the tensor irrep is outside minimal coupling, while the trace-vector irrep is generated by the Holst term under minimal coupling and is inside the Fierz lemma's reach via O4. Data and Code Availability now cites two additional artifacts via the \artifact convention (research/theory_audit/ech_torsion_onshell_2026_08_08.py and .md), with the frozen-commit provenance sentence restated accordingly. Also closed this round: Levi-Civita 'symbol' -> 'tensor' with eps_0123 = -1; the form-to-density Nieh-Yan conversion given in one line so Eq. (11)'s coefficients are reproducible from the quoted identity; M_Pl -> reduced M-bar_Pl inside the App. A 1 identity; the abstract gained a branch-vs-channel qualifier, a Tier-III qualifier on the 61-67 orders claim, and a softened independence claim; Table II's R2 birefringence register reconciled with the abstract's headline; App. A Case I's dimension-(+1) referent named; the Shapiro-Teixeira arXiv-version parenthetical explained; App. A density symbols glossed; and the abstract's long spanning-list sentence split. Deferred-genuine, carried unchanged: the frozen-release Zenodo DOI for this survey's own verification scripts (P-round packaging item the paper already discloses as planned). Page count moved 24 -> 25 because the correction required new text, reported rather than smoothed over; Grok's <=15 pp target remains unmet. DRAFT: R-phase NOT converged at R12 - two correctness-grade MAJORs plus several correctness-grade minors were found and closed, and the round overturned a result one of the paper's own released artifacts had asserted, so R13 on the exact v1C.0.15 PDF is the next correctness-convergence check; no readiness score has been computed and no venue/Zenodo kit exists yet.

Read PDF →

Flagship rebuild active. Current P3 is technical provenance support, not the discovery paper.

DESI anomaly discovery

Question: What unusual spectra emerge from a full-scale DESI anomaly search, and which candidates survive scientific validation?

Boundary: The enhanced parent catalog, exact model, score lineage, and selection reproducibility must be restored or regenerated before a flagship manuscript is drafted.

Supporting Data Release · DESI Public-ID Recovery · 3 · v3.2.0-r17
Public-ID Recovery for a Historical DESI DR1 Anomaly List: 170 High-Coordinate-Consistency Core and 11 Lower-Confidence Positional Associations

Supporting data release: public DESI IDs for the anomaly program's follow-up list

Publishes 181 public DESI DR1 TARGETID associations for the anomaly program's candidate list, split transparently into 170 high-coordinate-consistency core associations and 11 lower-confidence positional associations. v3.2.0-r17 binds the viewer captures, documents the exact 2,468-row positional-parent denominator, publishes the two-pass deduplication order, and content-hashes every resumable scan input — deterministic public-identifier and join/checkpoint machinery enabling auditable follow-up. This is a public-identifier and provenance data release, not a detection claim.

17 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage

Primary catalog result with a distinct standalone AJ environment companion.

Galaxy chirality

Question: Is there a large-scale observed-label chirality dipole in the released DESI imaging catalog?

Boundary: The result is not a physical primordial-parity constraint; morphology transfer and systematics remain open.

Lead Catalog Paper · Observed-Label Chirality Null · 4 · v1.0.274
An Observed-Label Chirality-Dipole Null in 890,069 Quality-Controlled High-Confidence DESI Spirals and an 8.5-Million-Galaxy Catalog

Do spiral galaxies' apparent handedness directions cluster? An 8.5M-galaxy test (result: no dipole)

Classifies 8.47M galaxies. The strict safe-sample observed-label statistic remains null-consistent (z=0.63465, p=0.23768), and the v1.0.268 CE-composition audit retained the GZ1-core realization while documenting the honest-negative CE-inclusive retrain. v1.0.274 expands Expected Calibration Error (ECE) at first use without changing the science; exact confirmation and Houston review remain separate gates.

32 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage
Standalone Companion · Chirality–Environment Null Test · 5 · v0.1.147-2026-08-03
Environmental Dependence of Spiral Chirality: A DESIVAST Catalog-Native Void Non-Detection with Secondary Cosmic-Web Cross-Checks

Does galaxy handedness differ inside cosmic voids? A null test companion to P4

On the released DESIVAST GALZONE parent, the focal exploratory analysis detects no void/non-void difference in classifier-labelled CW fraction; this bounded non-detection does not establish physical environment independence.

46 pp · evidence 95%
2/6 · next: latest-version review coverage