bigbounce/spin-torsion cosmology research program
research live

Research Program / Updated May 8, 2026 · 10:00 PM PT

Spin-Torsion Cosmology

A live research dossier testing bounce cosmology against inflation through archival survey mining, falsifiable signatures, and paper-ready evidence trails.

observational ledger
R43 Wave 14-RRR — P1A/P1B/P2/P3/P4 all 99%
Survey sources scored37.3M
Catalog anomalies retained378K
MCMC posterior samples424K+
Public research artifacts7 HF
5
Papers
8
Surveys
37.3M+
Sources Scored
319K+
Anomalies
424K+
MCMC Samples
4/8
QC Pass
4
Predictions
50
Queued

Testable Predictions →

Survey Results →

SurveySourcesAnomaliesQC
DESI DR122.5M spectra195,829 (0.87%)
PASS
SDSS DR182.3M spectra77,905 (3.4%)
CAUTION
LAMOST DR1011.4M spectra44,075 (0.39%)
CAUTION
eROSITA DR1930K X-ray sources298 (0.03%)
PASS
Planck CMB20K patches200 (1%)
PASS
ACT DR620K patches0 ()
FAIL
NEOWISE43.5K sources419 (0.96%)
PASS
Gaia DR350K variables500 (1%)
CAUTION

Research Papers →

Current Focus

R43 Wave 14-RRR — Paper 1 split into P1A + P1B; cobaya DESI DR2 w0wa chain in burn-in
Wave 14-GGGG ships P4 v1.0.32 → v1.0.33 with R44 MAJORs M1+M2+M3 + nit2: (M1) p_LEE harmonization at three abstract/body/discussion sites — the point estimate $9.999\times 10^{-5}$ replaced everywhere with the MC-resolution upper bound $p_{\rm LEE}<10^{-4}$ (and explicit prose noting that $1/(N_{\rm MC}+1)$ is a sample-size floor, not a measured probability density). Abstract paren-mismatch typo cleaned. (M2) GZ1 Platt parameters now reported to six significant figures: GZ1-recalibrated $A = 0.215143$, $B = -1.581205$ vs CE-ResNet $A = 0.215127$, $B = -1.581389$ — agreement at $|\Delta A|=1.6\times 10^{-5}$, $|\Delta B|=1.8\times 10^{-4}$ (precision-of-fit floor, not a 4-sig-fig rounding artifact). (M3) GZ1 48.4% vs Catalog-C 49.7% CW-fraction gap reframed as a paired McNemar test (b=4,205, c=3,607, $\chi^2_1 = 598^2/7{,}812 = 45.78$, $Z=6.77$); the unpaired binomial 5.5σ formula in earlier versions undercounted because per-galaxy Catalog-C ↔ GZ1 correlations reduce the effective variance below the uncorrelated null. The reframing actually strengthens the gap from 5.5σ to 6.77σ rather than weakening it; both papers' interpretation (gap consistent with combined ~1% GZ1 + ~0.5% Cat-C systematic floors, monopole not parity test) unchanged. (nit2) Stray `PUSHBACK` prose tokens swept (Sec VI.D bin-flatness 'PUSHBACK with reframe' → 'non-flatness'; closure stance label normalized to 'closed'). PDF: 22 pp / 25.65 MB / 0 undef refs. Wave 14-FFFF predecessor (P3 v3.1.23 → v3.1.24): Conclusions §6.5 cosmological-applications bullet rewritten to lead with Wave 14-VVV empirical α (σ(f_NL)=8.27±2.37 forecast, consistent with zero at <1σ); §VII legacy fixed-α=0.15 forecast (6.1% / 16.4%) subordinated under italic 'For reference' header; tier vocabulary disambiguated paper-wide (point-source 378,080 + catalog-grade 264,938 + exploratory 113,342 + Planck CMB-patch 200); Münchmeyer typo fix. R43 status (post Waves 14-WWW–DDDD): all 10 P3 BLOCKERs closed and zero P3 BLOCKERs returned in the R44 self-review. Cobaya DESI DR2 chain continues warm-restarted sampling: R̂−1 = 0.076 at May 8 18:27 PT (4,598 total accepted across 4 chains); publication-quality R̂−1 < 0.01 ETA 1–3 days. **Continuing R44→Rn loop: next is Wave 14-HHHH (P2 R44 BLOCKERs B1+B2 + MAJORs), Wave 14-IIII (P1A four-route appendix); cross-vendor non-Anthropic R-round will launch on R45 once R44 BLOCKERs+MAJORs are flushed.**

Currently running

  • Cobaya 4-chain MPI run on RTX A5000 pod ijzftpy3klystt — warm-started with posterior covmat from April-6 quintom chain; DESI DR2 + Planck NPIPE + Pantheon+ + DES-Y5; w0-wa CPL PPF; target R̂−1 < 0.01
  • Autonomous /loop self-pacing every ~25 min — polling pod, will GetDist + update P1B §Structural Tension + recompile when R̂−1 < 0.01

Explore